A landmark court case about Native fishing rights is 50 years old
View in browser
Catalog header

Boldt Decision

Chinook Salmon

Chinook Salmon, National Archives Identifier 166702694

Fifty years ago was a landmark court case you’ve likely never heard of: United States v. Washington, better known as the Boldt Decision. In February 1974, the federal government sued the state of Washington to force the state to comply with provisions in Indian treaties signed in the 19th century. The Boldt decision, named for Judge George Boldt of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, affirmed the fishing rights granted to tribes who signed the treaties and allocated 50% of the annual catch to treaty tribes.

Fraser River, Indian Catching Salmon
Four unidentified young Indian men with large salmon.

(Left) Fraser River, Indian Catching Salmon, National Archives Identifier 155824184 (Right) Four unidentified young Indian men with large salmon, National Archives Identifier 297544

After the state refused to enforce the court order, Judge Boldt ordered the United States Coast Guard and federal law enforcement agencies to enforce his rulings.

In 1975, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Judge Boldt's ruling. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a collateral attack on the case, largely endorsing Judge Boldt's ruling and the opinion of the Ninth Circuit.

 

The Boldt decision re-affirmed the rights of American Indian tribes in Washington State to continue harvesting salmon and other fish under the terms of various treaties with the U.S. government. The tribes ceded their land to the United States but reserved the right to fish as they always had, including their traditional locations off the designated reservations. 

Affidavit of Harold George
Affidavit of Thomas P. Schlosser

Affidavit of Harold George, National Archives Identifier 22440081

Affidavit of Thomas P. Schlosser, National Archives Identifier 22440082

(Left) From the testimony of Harold George, an enrolled member of the Quilleute Tribe, regarding how the Boldt fishing rights decision affected him.  

 

(Right) From the testimony of an attorney, Thomas P. Schlosser, for an organization of Western Washington Tribes, regarding his unsuccessful efforts to communicate with the U.S. Department of Fisheries.

Wide-View of Fishermen at Celilo Falls and the Celilo Bridge

Wide-View of Fishermen at Celilo Falls and the Celilo Bridge, National Archives Identifier 22440088

This photograph, taken before 1952, looking downstream at Celilo Falls, Oregon, with the Celilo Bridge (also known as the Oregon Trunk Railroad Bridge) in the background. Note the many fishermen along the banks. The loss of these fishing grounds were one of the issues considered in the 1974 fishing rights case, United States v. Washington (aka the Boldt Decision). 

Learn more about the Boldt Decision:

  • Boldt Decision Litigation Background Files, ca. 1968–ca. 1978 series from Record Group 22: Records of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 
  • Research Guides for both historic and modern Native Communities in Oregon and Washington relating to records held at the National Archives
  • 50 years of Boldt from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Catalog Tips and Tricks

We’re excited to share some new features in the Advanced Search. Researchers can now search the Catalog for all contributions: Tags, Comments, Extracted Text, and Transcriptions.

The drop down menu has been expanded to illustrate all of the contribution types available to search:

Contribution drop down menu

Not only can you search by contribution type, but the page where the contribution is found is highlighted with a green box around the thumbnail and a link to the page.

In this example we searched for a tag from the Revolutionary War Pension File project.  You can learn how to add these useful tags in our new how-to video:

How to Add Tags to Revolutionary War Pensions.

How to Add Tags to Revolutionary War Pensions

EXTRACTED TEXT TIP - If you don’t see the Extracted Text displayed in a Revolutionary War Pension file, reload the page.

Screenshot illustrating location of Extracted Text

Learn more about using Extracted Text in our November 22 newsletter AI and the Revolutionary War Pension Files.

National Archives Catalog Feedback Survey
Female switchboard operator at the Potsdam Conference

Do you search the Catalog or contribute as a Citizen Archivist? If you do, we want your feedback!

Please take a moment to take our survey to tell us what you like, what you don’t like, and how we can improve.  We value your feedback and use it to

improve the Catalog, Citizen Archivist, and instructions on how to use the Catalog and contribute as a Citizen Archivist.

Take the Survey

History Hub

Start your research on History Hub

Animated gif of a an archivist showing and handing a document to a researcher. They are standing in front of a large shelf of books

Want to learn more about Native Treaties or Court Cases? Check out History Hub’s Native American Records and Court Records communities for some prime bait for your research:

 

How do I search the Dawes Rolls (The Final Rolls of the Five Civilized Tribes, 1899–1914)?

 

I’m looking for a court case from several US Interior Department locations over the years of 1895-1897.

 

Where can I find info on a court case from Washington State?

 

I’m seeking transcriptions for Indian Claims Commission Records about the Skagit Tribe of Indians for Washington State

 

Blog Post: The Native American Treaties Explorer

 

Blog Post: Digitized Native American Reservation Records

Are you starting research of your own? Make History Hub your first stop! You can ask—or answer—questions on History Hub, or see if your question has already been answered! Check out our featured edition for more details, information, and instructions about using History Hub for your research.

History Hub logo

Questions or comments? Email us at catalog@nara.gov

NARA logo

National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road, , College Park,Maryland,20740,USA,

Unsubscribe/Manage Preferences

Facebook
X
Instagram

Privacy Policy